hostfinancial.blogg.se

Liveleak new zealand shootings
Liveleak new zealand shootings








liveleak new zealand shootings

So there we have it - censorship is in full swing here in New Zealand! /o2VPDsZNLb- VOOM March 17, 2019

liveleak new zealand shootings

Well I just turned on the VPN and Zerohedge is now available.

liveleak new zealand shootings

If you are found to have a copy of the video or to have shared it, you face fines & potential imprisonment,” read a statement from the police via local news source Wellington Live. Police have meanwhile issued an overt threat to anyone else looking for the video.

liveleak new zealand shootings

The teenager faces up to ten years in prison, under New Zealand’s ‘objectionable and restricted material’ laws. With the footage proliferating on several hosting platforms afterwards, the Kiwi authorities have already charged an 18-year-old man for sharing the video, as well as for posting other “objectionable” comments days before the shooting. Video footage of killer Brenton Tarrant’s shooting spree at a Christchurch mosque on Friday – which left 50 worshippers dead – was pulled from Facebook immediately after the massacre. It said the video was made by a "psychopath," and that it did not wish to be "a vehicle of choice for those who carry these events out.New Zealand police are warning citizens they’ll face 10 years in prison for sharing the Christchurch mosque attack video, and a host of websites have been blocked as censors scrub the shooter’s manifesto from the internet. LiveLeak-well-known for hosting graphic videos of combat and violent crime-had already said it would not host footage from the Christchurch attack. I view it as a debatable but entirely rational editorial decision." "One could argue about whether it violates the spirit of the First Amendment for the telecoms to have made that decision. "The First Amendment applies only to the government, so the decision of telecoms about what to carry could not violate the First Amendment any more than a decision of a newspaper or magazine could," he explained. would be within their rights to block sites if they so wished. Floyd Abrams, a senior counsel at Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP in New York and a First Amendment expert, told Newsweek that ISPs in the U.S. companies may follow the example being set in Australia. There has not yet been any suggestion that U.S. Given that the shootings were streamed live on Facebook, the social media giant came in for additional criticism. Lawmakers and activists across the globe called on social media companies and other sites to do more to block and remove extremist content in the aftermath of the Christchurch attack. The Australian Communications Alliance also cited "extraordinary circumstances" for the ISPs' decision to block the websites, noting the companies had been working to "minimize any inconvenience that may arise from legitimate content being blocked," which it called an "unavoidable, temporary consequence." Optus said it made its decision after "reflecting on community expectations." Companies tried to scrub copies from the internet as the world reacted to the massacre but struggled to keep up with its spread.Ī spokesperson for Vodafone said that the company would only usually block access to a site on the request of law enforcement or the courts, but that this "was an extreme case which we think requires an extraordinary response… While there were discussions at an industry level about this issue, this is a decision Vodafone Australia came to independently," the statement said. New Zealand police and Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern asked people not to share the graphic video. The Australian citizen live-streamed his attack on Facebook, and the footage quickly spread across the internet. The block on 4chan was lifted after a few hours, Nine News said, but the other websites remained inaccessible.īrenton Tarrant, 28, was accused of murdering 50 people at two mosques in Christchurch last Friday, in what authorities described as a white supremacist terrorist attack. Telstra released a statement in which Networks and IT Executive Nikos Katinakis explained, "We understand this may inconvenience some legitimate users of these sites, but these are extreme circumstances, and we feel this is the right thing to do." The sites were also unavailable on Optus and Vodafone networks, although the companies had not confirmed the names of the sites they had blocked. Several major Australian telecom companies blocked access to many websites accused of hosting and contributing to the dissemination of footage of the Christchurch, New Zealand, terrorist attack on two mosques last Friday.Īccording to Nine News, Telstra-the country's largest telecommunications company-blocked access to 4chan, 8chan, Voat, the blog Zerohedge and hosting platform LiveLeak on Tuesday.










Liveleak new zealand shootings